All manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Islamic Pedagogical Innovation (JIPI) must align with the journal's Aim and Scope and comply with the Author Guidelines. Submitted manuscripts should demonstrate scientific originality, methodological rigor, and a significant contribution to the advancement of Islamic education, pedagogy, educational innovation, and related interdisciplinary fields. Manuscripts must be original, unpublished, and not under consideration by another journal. Prior to the review process, all submissions are screened for plagiarism using similarity detection software to ensure academic integrity and ethical publication standards.

Each manuscript that passes the initial editorial screening will undergo a double-blind peer review process by at least two independent expert reviewers with relevant expertise. The reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on its originality, theoretical contribution, research methodology, data analysis, clarity of presentation, and relevance to the journal's scope. Authors may be requested to revise their manuscripts in response to reviewers' comments. The review process is conducted objectively, confidentially, and fairly to maintain the highest standards of scholarly publishing.

The final decision regarding manuscript acceptance, revision, or rejection rests with the Editor-in-Chief, based on the recommendations of the reviewers and the editorial board. Accepted articles are scheduled for publication according to editorial priorities, thematic relevance, and the completion of the editorial process. JIPI is committed to maintaining a transparent, rigorous, and timely peer-review process that supports the dissemination of high-quality research in Islamic pedagogical innovation.